Falling Towel Sparks ICC Rule Debate in Afghanistan-Zimbabwe ODI

Umpire Ahsan Raza calls a dead ball after the Afghanistan bowler’s towel falls during his delivery stride, sparking debate over the ICC rule on batter distraction.

October 20, 2026 at 5:59 PM
icon-facebook icon-twitter icon-whatsapp

ISLAMABAD: Can a falling towel save a batter after he has been clean bowled? That unusual question took centre stage during the Afghanistan-Zimbabwe ODI tri-series match at Zayed Cricket Stadium, when umpire Ahsan Raza overturned the apparent dismissal of Brian Bennett off Azmatullah Omarzai’s bowling by calling a dead ball.

The incident occurred in the eighth over of Zimbabwe’s innings when Afghanistan all-rounder Omarzai bowled Bennett. Although the ball hit the stumps, apparently dismissing the Zimbabwe batter, Bennett pointed out that the bowler’s towel had fallen just before the delivery.

Zimbabwe captain Sikandar Raza also drew the umpire’s attention to the incident. After apparently consulting with leg umpire Farooq Khan, Ahsan Raza called the delivery a dead ball, giving Bennett a reprieve.

Read Also: Bizarre ‘Wide Ball Six’ Stuns Cricket Fans in Canada Super60 Semifinal

The decision sparked debate among commentators over whether the batter should have moved away from the delivery or whether the falling towel had distracted him sufficiently to justify the umpire’s intervention.

What does the ICC rule say?

Clause 20.4.2.6 of the ICC Men’s ODI Playing Conditions addresses situations in which a batter is distracted while preparing to receive or receiving a delivery.

It states that either umpire shall call and signal a dead ball if the striker is distracted by noise, movement or another factor, whether the source of the distraction is inside or outside the match.

Read Also: ICC Introduces Five-Run Penalty for Batters Over Time-Wasting from October 1

In Bennett’s case, the falling towel during Omarzai’s run-up was treated as a potential distraction. Under the rule, the key question is whether the movement distracted the batter while he was preparing to receive or receiving the delivery.

Read Also: Pakistan’s Salman Ali Agha Reprimanded by ICC After Controversial Run-Out Against Bangladesh

However, the incident also raised questions about whether Bennett should have moved away rather than attempting the shot. One commentator argued that the batter had played the stroke, been bowled and only then raised the issue.

Another supported the umpire’s decision, suggesting that the towel’s sudden movement could have affected Bennett’s vision and concentration in the final moments before the ball arrived.

The law does not automatically make every delivery a dead ball simply because an object falls from the bowler. The decision depends on whether the circumstances meet the rule’s requirements for distraction. The timing of the towel’s fall and its effect on Bennett are therefore central to assessing the call.

Did the decision affect the match?

Bennett’s reprieve proved temporary. He was eventually dismissed in the 13th over for 31 off 40 balls as Zimbabwe struggled in their chase of Afghanistan’s 295-run target.

Read Also: Can Indian Players Avoid ICC Penalty Under Article 2.8?

Zimbabwe were bowled out for 136, suffering a 158-run defeat and dropping to second in the ODI tri-series points table.

Although the dead-ball decision generated debate, it did not significantly alter the match’s outcome.

icon-facebook icon-twitter icon-whatsapp