ISLAMABAD: Australia’s world-first decision to block social media accounts for everyone under 16 has triggered multiple legal challenges.
Reddit, the social news aggregation and discussion site, filed a suit on December 2, 2025, contending that law enforcement could set a dangerous precedent for online free expression.
The first challenge came from Sydney resident Emma Clarke on November 20, 2025, in the Federal Court of Australia, just days after the law was announced. Clarke argued that the ban infringes on her 15-year-old son’s right to participate in online communities for learning and hobbies. She said in court filings: “Teens use online spaces not just for social media but for school, projects, and support networks. A blanket ban removes these important outlets.”
Reddit’s lawyers emphasised that the law imposes a “speech restriction,” potentially limiting minors’ access to information, civic participation, and self-expression. Reddit’s lead attorney, Michael O’Connor, said: “The legislation forces platforms to collect sensitive data to verify age, which raises privacy and security risks. It is a heavy-handed approach that affects millions of users, including those using the platform for educational and civic purposes.”
Civil-rights organisations, including the Australian Human Rights Commission, have joined the debate. Commissioner Sarah Benson stated, “This ban may unintentionally limit political and social participation for young Australians. Courts need to ensure that rights are balanced against online safety measures.”
Consumer advocates have also highlighted technical challenges. Age assurance tools, such as ID verification and facial-age estimation, are necessary to enforce the law. Experts warn that widespread use of these methods could compromise user privacy and data security, and make young users more vulnerable to data breaches.
Parents and teachers are divided on the social implications. Supporters cite reduced exposure to cyberbullying and social pressure, likening the ban to age restrictions on driving or alcohol. Critics worry it may remove healthy social interactions and supervised online learning activities.
The Federal Court will review all aspects over the coming months, including minors’ rights, technical feasibility, and proportionality—the principle that legal measures should not be heavier than necessary to address the problem they seek to resolve.
The outcomes could influence global policy. Governments are watching closely; an upheld ban may encourage other nations to adopt strict age rules, while partial overturns could prompt re-evaluation of enforcement methods and online safety strategies.
